From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:29 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Stig=2D=D8rjan?= Smelror Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: mrtg graphics in Mozilla Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 15:40:37 +0100 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 26 Message-ID: <38B93765.C260440E@winther.net> References: <38B9265E.53BFF281@winther.net> <38B92CC3.D9D3E115@SSpaeth.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: kunde0793.alfanett.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-15mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: no, en Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > > Stig-Ørjan Smelror schrieb: > > > > When I load my mrtg page the graphics look really bad compared to NS > > 4.72 on Linux Mandrake 7.0. > > I'm using the latest nightly build, but it's been like this for a while. > > I had a look at www.winther.net and the pages look exactly the same on > 4.72 and latest Mozilla build. Which page do you exactly mean? > > Greetings > Sebastian Here is a temp link. http://home.winther.net/stig/MRTG/ Thanks for a quick response. -- Vennlig hilsen/Best Regards Stig-Ørjan Smelror Winther Computer Network DA http://www.winther.net Stig.Orjan.Smelror@winther.net Teknisk Ansvarlig Winther.Net ; Webhosting uten grenser. From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:29 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Kaj Nygren Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: mrtg graphics in Mozilla Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 15:58:53 +0100 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 10 Message-ID: <38B93BAC.DD6E0D03@connectthings.com> References: <38B9265E.53BFF281@winther.net> <38B92CC3.D9D3E115@SSpaeth.de> <38B93765.C260440E@winther.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: kaj.runius.internet42.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en,sv > http://home.winther.net/stig/MRTG/ > > Thanks for a quick response. I have filed bug #29428, quoting your original report as well as the link above. /Kaj From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:29 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Stig=2D=D8rjan?= Smelror Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: mrtg graphics in Mozilla Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 16:24:52 +0100 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 23 Message-ID: <38B941C4.22BCE82E@winther.net> References: <38B9265E.53BFF281@winther.net> <38B92CC3.D9D3E115@SSpaeth.de> <38B93765.C260440E@winther.net> <38B93BAC.DD6E0D03@connectthings.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: kunde0793.alfanett.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-15mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: no, en Kaj Nygren wrote: > > > http://home.winther.net/stig/MRTG/ > > > > Thanks for a quick response. > > I have filed bug #29428, quoting your original report as well as the > link above. > > /Kaj Thanks. The "weird", if I could call that, thing is that output from Webalizer (www.mrunix.net/webalizer/) looks ok. It too uses png. -- Vennlig hilsen/Best Regards Stig-Ørjan Smelror Winther Computer Network DA http://www.winther.net Stig.Orjan.Smelror@winther.net Teknisk Ansvarlig Winther.Net ; Webhosting uten grenser. From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:29 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Bob Crawford Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general,netscape.public.mozilla.builds,netscape.public.dev.css,netscape.public.dev.html,netscape.dev,netscape.public.dev.css,netscape.public.mozilla.layout,netscape.public.mozilla.ui Subject: Re: Fixed background not working Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 12:00:58 -0600 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 22 Message-ID: <38B9665A.5694661E@io.com> References: <387C3A38.A3B3C3DC@netscape.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: cs9351-169.austin.rr.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf Xref: secnews.netscape.com netscape.public.mozilla.general:16809 netscape.public.mozilla.builds:12885 netscape.public.dev.css:1433 netscape.public.dev.html:2843 netscape.dev:382 netscape.public.mozilla.layout:6770 netscape.public.mozilla.ui:5987 Patricio Feder wrote: > Mozilla's test page for this particular css tag doesn't work either. > http://www.mozilla.org/newlayout/testcases/css/sec535fix.htm > > I spent over 7 hours trying to fix this with (obviously) no success and I > couldn't find it reported as a bug either (a new one maybe?). > Does anybody know a workaround for this? Mozilla has more standards support than NS4.x.. 4.7 is a gettinging a bit obsolete.. The example works fine in Mozilla and IE5.. > > > Thanks > > Pat From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:29 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Jerome Kwok Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: I lost my wallet password Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 02:09:58 +0800 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 1 Message-ID: <38B96876.D930DF1F@hkid.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp8-228.att.net.hk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en,zh-TW I lost my Mozilla wallet password, what should I do? From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:29 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Stig=2D=D8rjan?= Smelror Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Ultra cool Scrollbar !! Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 02:12:30 +0100 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 11 Message-ID: <38B9CB7E.83ED06DB@winther.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: kunde0793.alfanett.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-15mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: no, en Whatever happened to the ultra cool scrollbar ?? All I see now is a GTK scrollbar and it's...well...kind of...boring ;) Well... anyway.. thanks for the good work ! -- Vennlig hilsen/Best Regards Stig-Ørjan Smelror Winther Computer Network DA http://www.winther.net Stig.Orjan.Smelror@winther.net Teknisk Ansvarlig Winther.Net ; Webhosting uten grenser. From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:29 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Kerry Ginn Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: Javascript not functioning in Mozilla, any build of m13 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 00:33:05 -0600 Organization: <> Lines: 36 Message-ID: <38BA1694.57E8CFB5@computer.org> References: <38B70C47.E980F748@wcla.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.96.175.83 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en-US Chad Berreau wrote: > > http://www.bentley.com/select/indexlow.htm > Go to this page. > Select the Select Stream Link, under Software. > > For time purposes > Select the from the Application Group - beta > and > from the lower radio button, show last month > > The issue is that the site incorporates buttons to the side with JavaScript which > show and hide additional information about the file it is associated with. > "Details" I couldn't get this far with either Navigator or mozilla M13. Apparently the site's database in offline. I will still make a guess -- For better or worse, if the site is using dynamic HTML, mozilla 5.0 will not recognize either document.all (used by MSIE 4) or document.layers (used by NN 4). For help with that issue, see the following URL: http://developer.iplanet.com/viewsource/goodman_cross/goodman_cross.htm > > In Netscape it will effect the command. > In Mozilla it doesn't acknowledge the code. > > also, > Netscape cannot print this page very well. > Mozilla can, minus the details bit. > I understand IE does very well. > > If you are experiencing the same results. Please submit the appropriate bug report. > > Thanks From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:29 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Dario Copia Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Mozilla Events docs Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 05:05:37 -0500 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 6 Message-ID: <38BA4870.68F68BFF@artide.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 1Cust45.tnt1.cambridge.ma.da.uu.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en Hello, please point me to some docs about Events capturer on Mozilla Seamonkey. TIA From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:29 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!gateway From: daviska@nationwide.com Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.ui,netscape.public.mozilla.performance,netscape.public.mozilla.builds,netscape.public.mozilla.wishlist,netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Build 13 - firewall? Date: 28 Feb 2000 13:49:04 GMT Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 9 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: h-207-200-73-41.netscape.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: mozilla-ui@mozilla.org, mozilla-performance@mozilla.org, mozilla-builds@mozilla.org, mozilla-wishlist@mozilla.org, mozilla-general@mozilla.org Xref: secnews.netscape.com netscape.public.mozilla.ui:6000 netscape.public.mozilla.performance:1358 netscape.public.mozilla.builds:12893 netscape.public.mozilla.wishlist:9238 netscape.public.mozilla.general:16815 You'd think that after 13 builds someone would have enabled the proxy server component. It's becoming very difficult to recommend something that can not be tested. The fact that this has not been included yet is quite simply, poor planning. That is of course, unless you plan to leave all enterprise business out of the loop. Way to win the battle! Kendall Davis From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:29 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!gateway From: chandani@bom8.vsnl.net.in (JITENDRA TANNA) Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: (no subject) Date: 28 Feb 2000 14:00:09 GMT Organization: DEEP EXPORTS Lines: 113 Message-ID: <38BA7F69.24B72848@bom8.vsnl.net.in> NNTP-Posting-Host: h-207-200-73-41.netscape.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------A3489ADA3D6E8A538B7C8F3D" To: mozilla-general@mozilla.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------A3489ADA3D6E8A538B7C8F3D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --------------A3489ADA3D6E8A538B7C8F3D Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii; name="msg02247.html" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="msg02247.html" Content-Base: "http://csf.colorado.edu/archive/1998/m ozilla-gen2/msg02247.html" Content-Location: "http://csf.colorado.edu/archive/1998/m ozilla-gen2/msg02247.html" Re: RFQ: Citric Acid Monohydrate < < < Date > > > | < < < Thread > > >

Re: RFQ: Citric Acid Monohydrate

T&G wrote:
> 
> Please quote your best prices, delivery & terms for  citric acid
> monohydrate powder in 25 kg bags FOB Chinese port.
> Regards
> Alan Youssef

$25 million dollars.

Sunny (who doesn't have the faintest idea on what the hell he's on
about)

-- 
***********************************************
sandeephundal@netscape.net         (Webmail)
ec95ssh2@brunel.ac.uk              (University)
http://www.brunel.ac.uk/~ec95ssh2/ [Cyberhome]
http://www.jazilla.org/            [Jazilla]
"All business is personal"   
                             - The Godfather
***********************************************


>From mozilla-general-request@mozilla.org  Sat Nov 14 17:44:27 1998
< < < Date > > > | < < < Thread > > > | Home

--------------A3489ADA3D6E8A538B7C8F3D-- From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:29 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!gateway From: mpt26@student.canterbury.ac.nz (Matthew Thomas) Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.builds,netscape.public.mozilla.general,netscape.public.mozilla.performance,netscape.public.mozilla.ui,netscape.public.mozilla.wishlist Subject: Re: Build 13 - firewall? Followup-To: netscape.public.mozilla.netlib Date: 28 Feb 2000 14:16:08 GMT Organization: University of Canterbury (opinions expressed are my own) Lines: 28 Message-ID: <38BA8325.44F1B49C@student.canterbury.ac.nz> References: Reply-To: mpt26@student.canterbury.ac.nz, mozilla-netlib@mozilla.org NNTP-Posting-Host: h-207-200-73-41.netscape.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: daviska@nationwide.com CC: mozilla-ui@mozilla.org, mozilla-performance@mozilla.org, mozilla-builds@mozilla.org, mozilla-wishlist@mozilla.org, mozilla-general@mozilla.org Xref: secnews.netscape.com netscape.public.mozilla.builds:12894 netscape.public.mozilla.general:16817 netscape.public.mozilla.performance:1359 netscape.public.mozilla.ui:6001 netscape.public.mozilla.wishlist:9239 daviska@nationwide.com wrote: > > You'd think that after 13 builds someone would have enabled the proxy > server component. It's becoming very difficult to recommend something > that can not be tested. The fact that this has not been included yet > is quite simply, poor planning. That is of course, unless you plan > to leave all enterprise business out of the loop. Way to win the > battle! >... Proxy servers have been working since the M13 milestone , over a month ago now. the UI for specifying them has been working in nightly builds since shortly after that. Those proxies which require authentication have been having a bit of trouble in the past few days, because the feature which remembers the authentication over a session has regressed . But this should be fixed in the next couple of days. Open mouth, insert foot, sir. Follow-ups set to n.p.m.netlib. -- Matthew `mpt' Thomas, usability weenie http://critique.net.nz/ From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:29 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!gateway From: daviska@nationwide.com Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.netlib,netscape.public.mozilla.ui,netscape.public.mozilla.performance,netscape.public.mozilla.builds,netscape.public.mozilla.wishlist,netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: (none) Date: 28 Feb 2000 15:32:05 GMT Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 70 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: h-207-200-73-41.netscape.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: mpt26@student.canterbury.ac.nz, mozilla-netlib@mozilla.org, mozilla-ui@mozilla.org, mozilla-performance@mozilla.org, mozilla-builds@mozilla.org, mozilla-wishlist@mozilla.org, mozilla-general@mozilla.org Xref: secnews.netscape.com netscape.public.mozilla.netlib:3542 netscape.public.mozilla.ui:6002 netscape.public.mozilla.performance:1361 netscape.public.mozilla.builds:12895 netscape.public.mozilla.wishlist:9240 netscape.public.mozilla.general:16818 I've already done this. I've tried both manual and automatic proxy configuration. Being someone who tests a lot of html, xml work, I have no problems with the proxy configuration in Netscape 3.04, 4.04, 4.05, 4.08, 4.5, 4.6, and 4.7. I also have no difficulty with proxy configuration in IE4 and 5, or Opera. My proxy configuration even works perfectly in my old Lynx browser (I don't know if you been using the net long enough to be familiar with Lynx.) It is ONLY Mozilla 13 that is not recognizing either manual or automatic proxy settings. I appreciate your information, but your suggestions have been implemented to no avail. Proxy configurations should have been implemented in earlier builds to give sufficient time for testing. IE6 is going to make it to market before Mozilla because of issues like this. I really hate seeing Netscape continuing to lose market share. K. Matthew Thomas on 02/28/2000 10:16:08 PM From: Matthew Thomas on 02/28/2000 10:16 PM Please respond to mpt26@student.canterbury.ac.nz; Please respond to mozilla-netlib@mozilla.org To: daviska@nationwide.com cc: mozilla-ui@mozilla.org mozilla-performance@mozilla.org mozilla-builds@mozilla.org mozilla-wishlist@mozilla.org mozilla-general@mozilla.org Subject: Re: Build 13 - firewall? daviska@nationwide.com wrote: > > You'd think that after 13 builds someone would have enabled the proxy > server component. It's becoming very difficult to recommend something > that can not be tested. The fact that this has not been included yet > is quite simply, poor planning. That is of course, unless you plan > to leave all enterprise business out of the loop. Way to win the > battle! >... Proxy servers have been working since the M13 milestone , over a month ago now. the UI for specifying them has been working in nightly builds since shortly after that. Those proxies which require authentication have been having a bit of trouble in the past few days, because the feature which remembers the authentication over a session has regressed . But this should be fixed in the next couple of days. Open mouth, insert foot, sir. Follow-ups set to n.p.m.netlib. -- Matthew `mpt' Thomas, usability weenie http://critique.net.nz/ From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:29 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Eric Krock Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.wishlist,netscape.public.mozilla.general,netscape.public.mozilla.plugins,netscape.public.dev.plugin-upgrade Subject: Re: creating an open source Mozilla plug-in SDK Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:33:36 -0800 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 79 Message-ID: <38BACD90.1705CA88@netscape.com> References: <894a3o$9l3$1@engnews3.Eng.Sun.COM> <38B63774.62CD0CA6@fateware.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: h-208-12-36-186.netscape.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en]C-NSCP (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en Xref: secnews.netscape.com netscape.public.mozilla.wishlist:9242 netscape.public.mozilla.general:16819 netscape.public.mozilla.plugins:204 netscape.public.dev.plugin-upgrade:93 I'd like to enthusiastically second Ramiro's proposal to allocate an intern to Mozilla Plug-in API-related work. After Andrei finishes his PDT+ bugs, he'll be creating a sample compilable Mozilla plug-in on Win32. On Mac, we already have the source for the MRJ plug-in as a compilable example (should be compilable once again after some fixes Patrick and Loki made in the last week). Here are the concepts that an open source sample plug-in/plug-in SDK could help developers master: 1) basic, compilable, sample plug-in (usable as development template) on each platform [have Mac; will have Win32 shortly; would like Linux, Solaris, etc.] 2) calling a plug-in from JavaScript on Mozilla via XPConnect 3) providing a backward adapter file and Java .class file to enable the single binary to work on older browsers such as Navigator 4 as well, including full LiveConnect support (this enables plug-in developers to distribute a single binary for all browsers, simplifying distribution) On Linux, a sample compilable plug-in (with GTK library inclusions where needed) would be particularly handy as the existing Navigator 4 plug-ins for Linux that have Motif UIs need to be upgraded to the GTK UI, and proliferating GTK-ready Mozilla plug-ins for Linux will help the vendors who are creating browsing appliances based on Linux and Mozilla. Once this new resource becomes available, the intern could also update the Mozilla Plug-in API doc at http://www.mozilla.org/docs/plugin.html to point developers at the samples where relevant. Using the two sample plug-ins as a starting point, an intern (or anyone else with a C background and the interest) could in a very short period of time (e.g. a summer) provide a great service to plug-in developers and all the developers of Mozilla-based browsers and devices. Feel free to contact me directly if needed for more information. Thanks for your interest in possibly pitching in on the project in this way! Ramiro Estrugo wrote: > Rich Burridge wrote: > > > > Our group at Sun is looking to hire some summer interns this year, and > > hopefully we can put a couple to work on Mozilla related projects. > .... > > Note also that the projects would probably have to be external to the > > Mozilla source tree, or if useful, slated for a future release, as it'll > > probably be show-stopper bug fixes only in the summer time. This still > > could be things like plug-ins, new components ... though. > .... > > Rich Burridge Email: rich.burridge@Sun.COM > > Here are some ideas. > .... > + Plugins. Part of this job might be a plugin cookbook. Documenting > the process and help fix bugs in the plugin api. Some people think that > the plugin situation in unix sucks. I think its a great opportunity. > Its all about innovation. There is very little backward compatibility > (if any) to worry about. So its all new code. Should be fun. > > Some plugins that might be interesting: other graphics formats (tiff, > xpm, etc.), sound plugins. Maybe mp3. Also, you guys at Sun have a > lot of experience dealing with the issue of out of process plugins for > mozilla. Now that there are real component model brewing for unix, it > would be nice to have a recipe for this too. > .... > -re -- What have *YOU* done for web standards today? http://www.mozilla.org/newlayout/bugathon.html Are your JavaScript and CGIs ready for Nav5, IE5, and HTTP 1.1 CONTENT_TYPE? Get the latest info at http://developer.netscape.com/viewsource/krock_v5.html Hints on upgrading web pages to support W3C standards: http://sites.netscape.net/ekrock/standards.html Have a question? Before you email me, first please check http://sites.netscape.com/ekrock/answers.html From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!newsfeed.netscape.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!newsfeed.nyu.edu!wesley.videotron.net!pr0n.openface.ca!not-for-mail From: Judd Shanker Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Question about using Mozilla as a COM control Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 14:44:43 -0500 Organization: Openface Internet Inc. Lines: 20 Message-ID: <38BAD02B.FBF22BB8@intac.com> Reply-To: jshanker@intac.com NNTP-Posting-Host: tapejob.metaclic.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: pr0n.openface.ca 951767050 25572 216.46.16.2 (28 Feb 2000 19:44:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@openface.ca NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Feb 2000 19:44:10 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en Hi everybody, This a question regarding Mozilla’s COM control. Please excuse me if this is not the proper place for this question, I am new to Mozilla. What I am trying to do for my project is to have Mozilla as a COM control embedded into a Windows application and when needed to get the corresponding rendered HTML page as a bitmap – not just what is visible on the screen, but the whole page as it exists (probably) in memory. Can someone help me with an idea how to do this (or where to look)? So far I didn’t find any functionality to accomplish this. Thank you an advance, Simeon From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!newsfeed.netscape.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!skynet.be!diablo.theplanet.net!baron.netcom.net.uk!netcom.net.uk!not-for-mail From: TheFish Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: HYPERLINKING Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 20:07:51 +0000 Organization: (Posted via) Netcom Internet Ltd. Lines: 9 Message-ID: <38BAD597.BC1EB17D@netcomuk.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup-18-04.netcomuk.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: taliesin2.netcom.net.uk 951768109 24625 194.42.232.132 (28 Feb 2000 20:01:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@corp.netcom.net.uk NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Feb 2000 20:01:49 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en-gb] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en-GB,en,en-* Help Can anyone please tell me how I add an hyperlink to a website e.mail address in my text eg: Poissant@netcomuk.co.uk Many thanks From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!news.columbia.edu!news-not-for-mail From: peller@columbia.edu (Adam Peller) Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: How to get stdout/console on win32? Date: 28 Feb 2000 16:43:52 -0500 Organization: Columbia University Lines: 14 Message-ID: <89eq6o$ltk$1@konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu With the M14 build, I noticed that Mozilla on win32 now forks to another process and no longer keeps the DOS box alive with stdout streaming to the console. I've got a lot of debugging info which I'd like to have available to beta users... Short of distributing debug builds or using special logging APIs (which require debug builds?) is there a way for users of the released Mozilla builds to get at the stdout? Some sort of runtime switch or environment variable perhaps? Thanks Adam Peller Advisory Software Engineer, IBM apeller@us.ibm.com From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Sebastian Spaeth Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: How to get stdout/console on win32? Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 23:10:57 +0100 Organization: University of =?iso-8859-1?Q?Link=F6ping?= Lines: 7 Message-ID: <38BAF271.6C7A6214@SSpaeth.de> References: <89eq6o$ltk$1@konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: f29.ryd.student.liu.se Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [de] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: sv,de,en > With the M14 build, I noticed that Mozilla on win32 now forks to > another process and no longer keeps the DOS box alive with stdout > streaming to the console. Quick fix is to run "mozilla > debug.txt" and have a look at debug.txt afterwards. There has been a thread about this somewhere with more proposals but I forgot where. From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Message-ID: <38BAF43D.293B6E4C@solana.com> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 17:18:37 -0500 From: William Lewis Brown X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Mozilla and CVSup or similar? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: brahma.solana.com X-Trace: 28 Feb 2000 17:15:42 -0500, brahma.solana.com Lines: 13 Path: secnews.netscape.com!newsfeed.netscape.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!News.Destek.net!brahma.solana.com Hi, Is the actual Mozilla CVS repository, not just the tip files, available directly? In other words, can I get access to the ,v files somehow? Is their a CVSup server available? Thanks for your help! Bill Brown -- William L. Brown Work: 603-465-2114 Fax: 603-465-2114 Cell: 617-803-9156 Email: bbrown@solana.com Home: 603-465-2948 From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!news.columbia.edu!news-not-for-mail From: peller@columbia.edu (Adam Peller) Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: How to get stdout/console on win32? Date: 28 Feb 2000 17:21:13 -0500 Organization: Columbia University Lines: 6 Message-ID: <89escp$72l$1@konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu> References: <89eq6o$ltk$1@konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu> <89eqil$jjc2@secnews.netscape.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu Sorry... I meant the nightly builds of M14. In article <89eqil$jjc2@secnews.netscape.com>, Stephen Donner wrote: >How are you getting the M14 builds already? Or do you just mean the nightly >builds? From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!news.columbia.edu!news-not-for-mail From: peller@columbia.edu (Adam Peller) Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: How to get stdout/console on win32? Date: 28 Feb 2000 17:24:40 -0500 Organization: Columbia University Lines: 15 Message-ID: <89esj8$8cn$1@konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu> References: <89eq6o$ltk$1@konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu> <38BAF271.6C7A6214@SSpaeth.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu I don't think this works anymore, as there's no longer any output to redirect. Instead, you see a new fire-breathing dragon window pop up, and you then get your prompt back in DOS. In article <38BAF271.6C7A6214@SSpaeth.de>, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: >> With the M14 build, I noticed that Mozilla on win32 now forks to >> another process and no longer keeps the DOS box alive with stdout >> streaming to the console. > >Quick fix is to run "mozilla > debug.txt" and have a look at debug.txt >afterwards. There has been a thread about this somewhere with more >proposals but I forgot where. From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: "Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: Javascript not functioning in Mozilla, any build of m13 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 17:50:34 -0500 Organization: VPEA Lines: 64 Message-ID: <38BAFBAD.F560CFB9@kimbanet.com> References: <38B70C47.E980F748@wcla.com> <38BA1694.57E8CFB5@computer.org> Reply-To: pjones@kimbanet.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.34.233.221 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en Kerry Ginn wrote: > > Chad Berreau wrote: > > > > http://www.bentley.com/select/indexlow.htm > > Go to this page. > > Select the Select Stream Link, under Software. > > > > For time purposes > > Select the from the Application Group - beta > > and > > from the lower radio button, show last month > > > > The issue is that the site incorporates buttons to the side with JavaScript which > > show and hide additional information about the file it is associated with. > > "Details" > > I couldn't get this far with either Navigator or mozilla M13. Apparently > the site's database in offline. I will still make a guess -- For better > or worse, if the site is using dynamic HTML, mozilla 5.0 will not > recognize either document.all (used by MSIE 4) or document.layers (used > by NN 4). For help with that issue, see the following URL: > > http://developer.iplanet.com/viewsource/goodman_cross/goodman_cross.htm MOzilla *doesn't* do DHTML ?!!!!! What do you mean it doesn't. It had better before it get's on the Market! I belong to an Electronics Service Industry Association (NESDA). I can tell you many of the Electronics Groups Tech Support Sites are going to DHTML as quick as they can. Mozilla /Netscape are supposed to be putting out an IE killer. Something Once it comes out will cause everyone including MicroSoft to Switch to Netscape. Get Crakin! > > > > In Netscape it will effect the command. > > In Mozilla it doesn't acknowledge the code. > > > > also, > > Netscape cannot print this page very well. > > Mozilla can, minus the details bit. > > I understand IE does very well. > > > > If you are experiencing the same results. Please submit the appropriate bug report. > > > > Thanks -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling 616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:540-632-5045, FAX:540-632-0868 Martinsville Va 24112-1809|pjones@kimbanet.com, ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet -------------------------------------------------------------------------- If it's "fixed", don't "break it"! From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!gateway From: chofmann@netscape.com (Chris Hofmann) Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: How to get stdout/console on win32? Date: 28 Feb 2000 23:06:24 GMT Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 24 Message-ID: <38BAFF70.EDA8F390@netscape.com> References: <89eq6o$ltk$1@konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: h-207-200-73-41.netscape.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Adam Peller CC: mozilla-general@mozilla.org mozilla > log.txt works for me on win95. chris h. Adam Peller wrote: > With the M14 build, I noticed that Mozilla on win32 now forks to > another process and no longer keeps the DOS box alive with stdout > streaming to the console. I've got a lot of debugging info which I'd > like to have available to beta users... Short of distributing debug > builds or using special logging APIs (which require debug builds?) is > there a way for users of the released Mozilla builds to get at the > stdout? Some sort of runtime switch or environment variable perhaps? > > Thanks > > Adam Peller > Advisory Software Engineer, IBM > apeller@us.ibm.com From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Robert O'Callahan Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: How to get stdout/console on win32? Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 18:17:14 -0500 Organization: Carnegie Mellon University Lines: 17 Message-ID: <38BB01FA.1C2DD717@cs.cmu.edu> References: <89eq6o$ltk$1@konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu> <38BAF271.6C7A6214@SSpaeth.de> <89esj8$8cn$1@konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu> Reply-To: roc+@cs.cmu.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: MAJESTY.FAC.CS.CMU.EDU Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en-GB,en Adam Peller wrote: > I don't think this works anymore, as there's no longer any output to > redirect. Instead, you see a new fire-breathing dragon window pop up, > and you then get your prompt back in DOS. No, it does still work. If you have "cat" on your system, you can also run "mozilla | cat" and the output will show up in your window. Rob -- [Robert O'Callahan http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~roc 6th year CMU CS PhD student "I have seen the burden God has laid on men. He has made everything beautiful in its time. He has also set eternity in the hearts of men; yet they cannot fathom what God has done from beginning to end." --- Ecclesiastes 3:10-11] From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!gateway From: jst@citec.fi (Johnny Stenback) Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: How to get stdout/console on win32? Date: 28 Feb 2000 23:45:35 GMT Organization: CiTEC Lines: 32 Sender: jst@towanda.citec.fi Message-ID: <38BB089F.50843834@citec.fi> References: <89eq6o$ltk$1@konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu> <38BAFF70.EDA8F390@netscape.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: h-207-200-73-41.netscape.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Chris Hofmann CC: Adam Peller , mozilla-general@mozilla.org Chris Hofmann wrote: > > mozilla > log.txt > > works for me on win95. > Yes, this works but it seems like this only redirects stdout to log.txt, not stderr. Have a look at bug #29395 and prove me wrong if this is not true. > chris h. > > Adam Peller wrote: > > > With the M14 build, I noticed that Mozilla on win32 now forks to > > another process and no longer keeps the DOS box alive with stdout > > streaming to the console. I've got a lot of debugging info which I'd > > like to have available to beta users... Short of distributing debug > > builds or using special logging APIs (which require debug builds?) is > > there a way for users of the released Mozilla builds to get at the > > stdout? Some sort of runtime switch or environment variable perhaps? > > > > Thanks > > > > Adam Peller > > Advisory Software Engineer, IBM > > apeller@us.ibm.com -- jst From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Doug Sheppard Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: Javascript not functioning in Mozilla, any build of m13 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 19:04:53 -0600 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 16 Message-ID: <38BB1B35.F6A83750@waitingforbob.com> References: <38B70C47.E980F748@wcla.com> <38BA1694.57E8CFB5@computer.org> <38BAFBAD.F560CFB9@kimbanet.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: nodes5.dlcwest.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.9 i686) X-Accept-Language: en "Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote: > > I couldn't get this far with either Navigator or mozilla M13. Apparently > > the site's database in offline. I will still make a guess -- For better > > or worse, if the site is using dynamic HTML, mozilla 5.0 will not > > recognize either document.all (used by MSIE 4) or document.layers (used > > by NN 4). For help with that issue, see the following URL: > > MOzilla *doesn't* do DHTML ?!!!!! No, Mozilla doesn't recognize document.layers or document.all. In the lizard world, you use the DOM standards and CSS to do dynamic stuff. -- Waiting for Bob - http://www.waitingforbob.com/ - No Godot, just comics. From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Steve Morrison Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: Javascript not functioning in Mozilla, any build of m13 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 20:33:23 -0500 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 21 Message-ID: <38BB21E3.7BF6A5FC@gte.com> References: <38B70C47.E980F748@wcla.com> <38BA1694.57E8CFB5@computer.org> <38BAFBAD.F560CFB9@kimbanet.com> <38BB1B35.F6A83750@waitingforbob.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: bsg-ma1a-50.ix.netcom.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.5-15 i586) X-Accept-Language: en Doug Sheppard wrote: > > "Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote: > > > I couldn't get this far with either Navigator or mozilla M13. Apparently > > > the site's database in offline. I will still make a guess -- For better > > > or worse, if the site is using dynamic HTML, mozilla 5.0 will not > > > recognize either document.all (used by MSIE 4) or document.layers (used > > > by NN 4). For help with that issue, see the following URL: > > > > MOzilla *doesn't* do DHTML ?!!!!! > > No, Mozilla doesn't recognize document.layers or document.all. > > In the lizard world, you use the DOM standards and CSS to do dynamic > stuff. People are working on a document.all emulation layer - check the DOM newsgroup for more info. -Steve http://www.mozillaZine.org/chrome/ From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Daniel Veditz Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: How to get stdout/console on win32? Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 17:37:09 -0800 Organization: Speaking only for myself Lines: 22 Message-ID: <38BB22C5.F9BEF6C6@netscape.com> References: <89eq6o$ltk$1@konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu> <38BAFF70.EDA8F390@netscape.com> <38BB089F.50843834@citec.fi> NNTP-Posting-Host: h-205-217-240-39.netscape.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en Johnny Stenback wrote: > > Chris Hofmann wrote: > > > > mozilla > log.txt > > > > works for me on win95. > > > > Yes, this works but it seems like this only redirects stdout to log.txt, > not stderr. Have a look at bug #29395 and prove me wrong if this is not > true. Have you tried an alternate shell as suggested in the bug? 4DOS/4NT will redirect stderr with >& instead of the usual >, and various unix-shell emulators (bash comes free in cygwin, for example) will do this also. The standard MS command shells won't, however. -Dan Veditz From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!newsfeed.netscape.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!news.infoave.net!news.infoave.net!uunet!ffx.uu.net!finch!not-for-mail From: marty@cssun.mathcs.emory.edu (Marty Reynolds {guest}) Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: html's 'mailto' won't Date: 29 Feb 2000 02:08:48 GMT Organization: Emory University, Dept of Math and CS Lines: 20 Message-ID: <89f9ng$3rh$1@finch.mathcs.emory.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: cssun.mathcs.emory.edu X-Trace: finch.mathcs.emory.edu 951790128 3953 170.140.150.1 (29 Feb 2000 02:08:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@finch.mathcs.emory.edu NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Feb 2000 02:08:48 GMT X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0] won't what? Won't launch a outside panel to send email. It's just refused when I click Running Solaris 2.6 & Navigator 4.51 Same trouble @ work on Sol. 2.7 & Navi 4.72. I bet I've forgotten something. Thanks for the attn. Marty... who think's the Netscape Tech Supt search data base is Crazy. I get 'file not found' to everything returned. Is this a test? -- Marty Reynolds... a guest at: Emory University, Atlanta, GA Internet: marty@aa4rm.ba-watch.org From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!newsfeed.netscape.com!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newshub2.home.com!news.home.com!news1.rdc1.sdca.home.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Sean Malloy Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Approved: Approved by Bureau of Natural Disasters, Planning Division: Public Release Subject: Re: html's 'mailto' won't Organization: Bureau of Natural Disasters, Planning Division Reply-To: srmalloy@home.com Message-ID: References: <89f9ng$3rh$1@finch.mathcs.emory.edu> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.6/32.525 X-No-Archive: yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 28 Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 05:19:28 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.0.163.210 X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net X-Trace: news1.rdc1.sdca.home.com 951801568 24.0.163.210 (Mon, 28 Feb 2000 21:19:28 PST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 21:19:28 PST marty@cssun.mathcs.emory.edu (Marty Reynolds {guest}) wrote: >won't what? > >Won't launch a outside panel to send email. It's just refused when I click > >Running Solaris 2.6 & Navigator 4.51 > >Same trouble @ work on Sol. 2.7 & Navi 4.72. > >I bet I've forgotten something. Could be; I remember having problems when I wrote a mailto: link as 'mailto://user@host' instead of 'mailto:user@host' as it should have been. The habitual insertion of '//' after the protocol was the problem. -- Sean R. Malloy | American Non Sequitur Naval Medical Center | Society San Diego, CA 92134-5000 | srmalloy@home.net | "We may not make sense, srmalloy@nmcsd.med.navy.mil | but we do like pizza" FORMAL NOTICE: unsolicited commercial email will be read at a charge of $500 per item. Receipt of such email shall be considered to constitute acceptance of contract, and will be billed immediately. From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Jerry Baker Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: How to use Gnu Tools Patch? Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 22:10:16 -0800 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 9 Message-ID: <38BB62C8.DDD34ADF@weirdness.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lsanca1-ar3-145-172.dsl.gtei.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en What is the correct sequence of command line options to obtain a useful output from patch? I have modified nsHTTPhandler.cpp and would like to attach the modification to a bug in a meaningful way. Thanks. -- Jerry Baker PGP Mail Preferred Key: http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x09DE91C6 From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Andreas Otte Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: How to use Gnu Tools Patch? Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 09:08:08 +0100 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 51 Message-ID: <38BB7E68.D01D300C@team-pb.de> References: <38BB62C8.DDD34ADF@weirdness.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.185.52.66 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------E78B9BA8F90E6C86FA9D4375" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en To: Jerry Baker --------------E78B9BA8F90E6C86FA9D4375 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Jerry! If you use cvs to get the sources you could use "cvs diff -c file > file.diff" to get a usefull diff patch could use. Otherwise diff -c file1 file2 > file.diff should produce something useable. Andreas Jerry Baker wrote: > What is the correct sequence of command line options to obtain a useful > output from patch? I have modified nsHTTPhandler.cpp and would like to > attach the modification to a bug in a meaningful way. Thanks. > > -- > Jerry Baker > > PGP Mail Preferred > Key: http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x09DE91C6 --------------E78B9BA8F90E6C86FA9D4375 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Jerry!

If you use cvs to get the sources you could use "cvs diff -c file > file.diff" to get a usefull diff patch could use.

Otherwise diff -c file1 file2 > file.diff should produce something useable.

Andreas

Jerry Baker wrote:

What is the correct sequence of command line options to obtain a useful
output from patch? I have modified nsHTTPhandler.cpp and would like to
attach the modification to a bug in a meaningful way. Thanks.

--
Jerry Baker

PGP Mail Preferred
Key: http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x09DE91C6

--------------E78B9BA8F90E6C86FA9D4375-- From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: "Braden N. McDaniel" Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.mail-news,netscape.public.mozilla.netlib,netscape.public.mozilla.general,netscape.public.mozilla.xpfe Subject: Re: please document URI schemes Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 05:13:09 -0500 Organization: Endoframe Lines: 45 Message-ID: <38BB9BB5.8D04AD6F@endoframe.com> References: <38462565.4F2D7FD0@w3.org> <3846ED0B.D2CB0DD8@mozilla.org> <38478391.74CF8D3D@cannibal.mi.org> <384788CB.8FB3EE2C@primus-online.de> <38B81A57.2810A2A2@bucksch.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: wa0250.tnt1.awod.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12-20 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Xref: secnews.netscape.com netscape.public.mozilla.mail-news:7149 netscape.public.mozilla.netlib:3547 netscape.public.mozilla.general:16840 netscape.public.mozilla.xpfe:5761 Ben Bucksch wrote: > > Andreas Otte wrote: > > Dawn Endico wrote: > > > > Dan Connolly wrote: > > > > > I learned tonight that Mozilla has some unregistered > > > > > URI schemes. Please send whatever info you can about > > > > > them to uri@w3.org > > > > > > > > > > "This is (an attempt at) an exhaustive list of URI schemes. I try to > > > > > list > > > > > them all, whether they're standard or not. 75 schemes are listed as of > > > > > Mar 1999. If you know of any that aren't here, please tell me via the > > > > > relevant forums." > > > > > -- http://www.w3.org/Addressing/schemes > > > I also believe we use chrome:// although I > > > don't see anything about it in netlib. Is there anything else I missed? > > IIRC, it is handled by the resource protocol handler. > > > I think there are also some schemes from the > > mailnews group > > > > mailto:, mailbox:, news:, > > imap:, pop3:, > From these 5, only mailbox: is missing in the w3 doc. Can somebody > define it? > > > ???? > > Are we missing some mailnews schemes? > > Other schemes, which are supported by Mozilla or may be supported in the > future? In keeping RFC 2717, any schemes that Mozilla is introducing should *not* be under the IETF tree. Looking at 3.3 of said RFC, it looks like "chrome" and the like should be changed to something along the lines of "mozilla-chrome". -- Braden N. McDaniel braden@endoframe.com From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: "mh12345678" Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.layout.checkins,netscape.public.mozilla.layout,netscape.public.mozilla.java,netscape.public.mozilla.i18n,netscape.public.mozilla.gtk,netscape.public.mozilla.general,netscape.public.mozilla.embedding,netscape.public.mozilla.editor,n Subject: Re: ¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä... ÃֽŠÇÁ·Î±×·¥ ÆË´Ï´Ù. Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 19:50:53 +0800 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 62 Message-ID: <89gbs6$q5s2@secnews.netscape.com> References: <08f423238011689B1MAIL1@mail1.lginternet.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.97.188.143 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Xref: secnews.netscape.com netscape.public.mozilla.layout.checkins:2519 netscape.public.mozilla.layout:6805 netscape.public.mozilla.java:6940 netscape.public.mozilla.i18n:3245 netscape.public.mozilla.gtk:1571 netscape.public.mozilla.general:16841 netscape.public.mozilla.embedding:560 netscape.public.mozilla.editor:2923 12345678 wrote in message news:08f423238011689B1MAIL1@mail1.lginternet.net... > ÀÌ·¸°Ô ¾çÇØ ¾øÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀ» ·Á Á˼ÛÇ´Ï´? ÇÊ¿ä¾øÀ¸½Å ºÐÀº »èÁ¦¹Ù¶ø´Ï´Ù. > > > > Á¶±ÝÀÇ ¾ç½ÉÀ» °¡Áö°í ±¹³»»ê ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î´Â Ãë±ÞÇÏÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù.¹®ÀÇ ÇÏÁö ¸»¾Æ > Áֽʽÿä > > - °Å·¡ ¹æ¹ý > °£È¤ Á÷°Å·¡¿Í ¿ìÆí°Å·¡·Î ¿ì¿Á¿ÇϽô ºÐéÀ?°è½Å?óÀ½ °Å·¡½Ã > Àý´ë Á÷°Å·¡¸¦ ÇÏÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù. Àú¿¡°Ô ÁÖ¹®¸ÞÀÏÀ» ÁÖ½Ã¸é °èÁ¹øÈ£¿Í ÀüÈ­ ¹øÈ£¸¦ > > ¾Ë·Á ¸³´Ï´Ù. Á¤ Á¦°¡ Àǽɽº·¯¿ì½Å ºÐéÀ?À¯Áî³Ý¿¡ ¸Å ÀÇ ½ÅÀÓ¿¡ ´ë?±ÛÀ» > ¿Ã·Á > º¸½Ã¸é ÇϷ縸¿¡ ¾Ë¾Æ º¸½Ç ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. > Á÷°Å·¡´Â ȸ¿øé¿?ÇÇؼ?¿øÇÏ½Ç °æ¿ì¸¸ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁý´Ï´Ù. > > > - ¿ì¼Û·á > ¸ð?¹èÆ÷¿¡ ´ëÇØ 2À±îÁö´?2ÿøÀ̸? 3ÀºÎÅ?¹«Ç´ë·?3ÿøÀÔ´Ï´? > ÀÌ´Â ¹«Á¶°Ç 'ºü¸¥ î±?À̸ç, ¿ì¼ÛÁß ºÒ¹Ì½º·± ÀÏ·Î ½Ã°£ Áö¿¬ÀÌ ÀÖÀ» ¼ö > ÀÖÀ¸¹Ç·Î ±âŸ ÃÀçÁöº¯À̳?°ø±Ç·ÂÀÇ ¿¾÷¹æÇØîÀÇ »çÀ¯·Î ¹ß¼ÛÀÌ ´Ê¾îÁú °æ¿ì ´Â > ÃÖ´ë > 5ÀÏÁ¤°¡ °É¸± ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. > > > ½Åû¼­ Çü½Ä > ~~~~~~~~~~~ > ¿ìÆí¹øÈ£ : > ÁÖ¼Ò : ¾î?¾î?»ç´Â... > ½ÅûÀÚ À̸§ : È«±æ? --ÀÔ±ÝÀÚ¿Í ¿ÀÏÇÏÁ?¾ÊÀº°æ¿ì ÀÔ±ÝÀÚ ±âÀçÇÒ°Í > ÀüÈ­¹øÈ£ : (ÁýÀ̳ª Á÷ÀÀüÈ­¸?²À Æ÷ÇÔÇؼ­ Àû¾î ÁÖ¼¼¿ä.) > ½Åûǰ¸ñ : RG-1 > GR-2 > OS-WINDOWS2000 > OS-MS OFFICE 97 > > À§ÀÇ ¾ç½ÄÀ¸·Î ÀÛ¼ºÇϼż­ ÀÔ±ÝÀü¿¡ ¸ÞÀÏ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä.ÀÔ±ÝÈ®ÀÎÈÄ ´ÙÀ½³¯ º¸³»¸³´Ï ´Ù. > °¡°ÝÈïÁ¤ÇϽǺÐÀº ¿¬¶ôÁÖÁö ¸¶½Ê½Ã¿ä. Àú ¾öû³­ À§ÇèÀ» °¨¼öÇÏ°í Çϴ°̴ϴÙ. > ÀÌÇØÇØ Áֽʽÿä > > > ÁÖ¹®Àº ¸ÞÀϷθ¸ ¹Þ½À´Ï´Ù. > > ÁÖ¹®ÇϽŠ°³Àαâ·ÏÀº °Å·¡ Á¾·áÈÄ »èÁ¦ Ë´Ï´? > > > > °¡°Ý Ç¥½Ã ¾ø´Â°ÍÀº 10000¿ø ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. > From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Robert Kaiser Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: HYPERLINKING Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 14:46:54 +0100 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 9 Message-ID: <38BBCDCD.B28BE331@StarTrekMail.com> References: <38BAD597.BC1EB17D@netcomuk.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: robert.hirsch.sth.ac.at Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [de] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: de-AT,de,en-US,en,it Poissant@netcomuk.co.uk Hope I've helped you. Robert Kaiser P.S.: This is a Mozilla (next generation web browser) newsgroup, not really a html help ng. From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: "Frederick G.M. Roeber" Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.mail-news,netscape.public.mozilla.netlib,netscape.public.mozilla.general,netscape.public.mozilla.xpfe Subject: Re: please document URI schemes Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 09:07:50 -0800 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 62 Message-ID: <38BBFCE6.9134A316@netscape.com> References: <38462565.4F2D7FD0@w3.org> <3846ED0B.D2CB0DD8@mozilla.org> <38478391.74CF8D3D@cannibal.mi.org> <384788CB.8FB3EE2C@primus-online.de> <38B81A57.2810A2A2@bucksch.com> <38BB9BB5.8D04AD6F@endoframe.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: h-208-12-62-99.netscape.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms04EB424562049693B0A0A4FA" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.71 [en] (X11; U; IRIX 6.3 IP32) X-Accept-Language: en, fr, es Xref: secnews.netscape.com netscape.public.mozilla.mail-news:7153 netscape.public.mozilla.netlib:3551 netscape.public.mozilla.general:16843 netscape.public.mozilla.xpfe:5762 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms04EB424562049693B0A0A4FA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > In keeping RFC 2717, any schemes that Mozilla is introducing > should *not* be under the IETF tree. Looking at 3.3 of said > RFC, it looks like "chrome" and the like should be changed > to something along the lines of "mozilla-chrome". For that matter, '//' is supposed to introduce a hostname. Tim swiped that from the Apollo network filesystem, which was popular at CERN. --------------ms04EB424562049693B0A0A4FA Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIIIhQYJKoZIhvcNAQcCoIIIdjCCCHICAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMAsGCSqGSIb3DQEHAaCC BlgwggMLMIICdKADAgECAgIQIzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADCBkzELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxCzAJ BgNVBAgTAkNBMRYwFAYDVQQHEw1Nb3VudGFpbiBWaWV3MRswGQYDVQQKExJBbWVyaWNhIE9u bGluZSBJbmMxGTAXBgNVBAsTEEFPTCBUZWNobm9sb2dpZXMxJzAlBgNVBAMTHkludHJhbmV0 IENlcnRpZmljYXRlIEF1dGhvcml0eTAeFw05OTEyMTMyMTI1MjVaFw0wMDA2MTAyMTI1MjVa MIGBMRMwEQYKCZImiZPyLGQBGRYDY29tMRgwFgYKCZImiZPyLGQBGRYIbmV0c2NhcGUxIjAg BgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWE3JvZWJlckBuZXRzY2FwZS5jb20xFDASBgNVBAMTC0ZyZWQgUm9lYmVy MRYwFAYKCZImiZPyLGQBARMGcm9lYmVyMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDG piwmrD95ptyTtQ+vqS/tv2PnRX2d2BkMwICmnMeQKH/PzQuHH0zzFE8nEv9tI8CgKZiDXUvs A67JXAGOJdvexbjvV+mLbf95fvF58iSXuf3wYbmoF1DRQZH4JZLPSFMsSlUGtDpJOqGR5bNH pSzZ0uXKI/x8Vn9pz5ze1WbnhwIDAQABo34wfDARBglghkgBhvhCAQEEBAMCBaAwDgYDVR0P AQH/BAQDAgSwMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFKI7ZTL39xuJ/FUNBwG8h0ha/ZA9MDYGCCsGAQUFBwEB BCowKDAmBggrBgEFBQcwAYYaaHR0cDovL25zb2NzcC5uZXRzY2FwZS5jb20wDQYJKoZIhvcN AQEEBQADgYEADFzeCqyskJ/522ibC1jY79twMDXzQ+hnInm09WiW6p9FC/K8eVxlkuINfJU+ RUzpEu10+pAgoG/g0iZ9PUvYBU3difSutybG9uvJDvMteuLZa9str4T0LbJ7oM3ClseH8eZ4 yIDgROZk6gpV+7TGA7VjgWS5Xy7huWIYf5ckJ14wggNFMIICrqADAgECAgEnMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBAUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQH EwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0 aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwg RnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5j b20wHhcNOTkwNjAzMjIwMDM0WhcNMDEwNjAyMjIwMDM0WjCBkzELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxCzAJ BgNVBAgTAkNBMRYwFAYDVQQHEw1Nb3VudGFpbiBWaWV3MRswGQYDVQQKExJBbWVyaWNhIE9u bGluZSBJbmMxGTAXBgNVBAsTEEFPTCBUZWNobm9sb2dpZXMxJzAlBgNVBAMTHkludHJhbmV0 IENlcnRpZmljYXRlIEF1dGhvcml0eTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEA4u9f LHZDiUsaX7Pl+Kpviy+BTWf/vUoPYy7E3IX2nixJJiD/ABfkiIhp3v2DV+CjERkRqtbcvO+z 0hUuVMZufL/ZucNG0wkFhOVTXEjthIWaDjs9Fgdc8LN5q5oQpbzBpNF4TAblZEH8BSVjJuvv DMduVKGMzlRXth+S2rISS40CAwEAAaNpMGcwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADAdBgNVHSUE FjAUBggrBgEFBQcDBAYIKwYBBQUHAwIwEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgECMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaA FHJJwnM0xlX0C3ZygX539IfnxrIOMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAA4GBALpQffwAsv9BtAcIOQwh 9FlJFwjMjtPPDFbxb+gLGmli6waCW2msHYQnBjnJDn41E9B+wI+cWHwDMSyHENViO3DVDrFk gDROWfrGWeZG3k5oCHVA9R2MKdaud63JPWnkQI1El0ZvvnrAWKSxH2qnDylRioENKY6d5A8z C4+NJD3sMYIB9TCCAfECAQEwgZowgZMxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQIEwJDQTEWMBQG A1UEBxMNTW91bnRhaW4gVmlldzEbMBkGA1UEChMSQW1lcmljYSBPbmxpbmUgSW5jMRkwFwYD VQQLExBBT0wgVGVjaG5vbG9naWVzMScwJQYDVQQDEx5JbnRyYW5ldCBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBB dXRob3JpdHkCAhAjMAkGBSsOAwIaBQCggbEwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAc BgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMDAwMjI5MTcwNzUwWjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUICj7h8uLcB7d 4S11n0wahX7fzIMwUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgIC AIAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICAUAwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEB BQAEgYBbHORoLPNBGgXoD/QTj5WqWplJdqAv9o9p4rVRptCuONhudBRPj+7no5Clz/rS3//0 T8dhspxyszdKyZZAuIy4nIGkFO1la9HOA6S/zVxKWPvJOMqa/IaMJvLiKjRWnuUA68UZD3Pt G4bIquKr9jjlWuRRibCu7JDY1NDP8JCpUQ== --------------ms04EB424562049693B0A0A4FA-- From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Johnny Stenback Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: How to get stdout/console on win32? Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 19:33:44 +0200 Organization: CiTEC Lines: 31 Message-ID: <38BC02F8.5292917D@citec.fi> References: <89eq6o$ltk$1@konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu> <38BAFF70.EDA8F390@netscape.com> <38BB089F.50843834@citec.fi> <38BB22C5.F9BEF6C6@netscape.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: fw.citec.fi Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12-20 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Daniel Veditz wrote: > > Johnny Stenback wrote: > > > > Chris Hofmann wrote: > > > > > > mozilla > log.txt > > > > > > works for me on win95. > > > > > > > Yes, this works but it seems like this only redirects stdout to log.txt, > > not stderr. Have a look at bug #29395 and prove me wrong if this is not > > true. > > Have you tried an alternate shell as suggested in the bug? > > 4DOS/4NT will redirect stderr with >& instead of the usual >, and > various unix-shell emulators (bash comes free in cygwin, for example) > will do this also. > Yes, I did try "mozilla.exe 2>&1 > foo" in bash on windows but that didn't work :( > The standard MS command shells won't, however. > > -Dan Veditz -- jst From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Petrus Lundqvist Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: Javascript not functioning in Mozilla, any build of m13 Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 21:41:03 +0200 Organization: peppe.net Lines: 79 Message-ID: <38BC20CF.F5667B29@peppe.net> References: <38B70C47.E980F748@wcla.com> <38BA1694.57E8CFB5@computer.org> <38BAFBAD.F560CFB9@kimbanet.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-195.dyn.arenanet.fi Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------msB53C9B030C06583AB9789EB8" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf To: pjones@kimbanet.com This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------msB53C9B030C06583AB9789EB8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > MOzilla *doesn't* do DHTML ?!!!!! Calm down. Of course Mozilla does DHTML. What Mozilla doesn't do is support non-standard document object models such as document.all or document.layers[]. DHTML is basically simply the action of changing CSS rules on the fly using some type of scripting language. > Mozilla /Netscape are supposed to be putting out an IE killer. "Supposed"? Where in the Mozilla mission statement does it say anything about killing IE or Microsoft?. It does however say that: "Mozilla is an open-source web browser, designed for standards-compliance, performance and portability" That's what's going on. Nobody is killing IE here so holster that gun. Peppe --------------msB53C9B030C06583AB9789EB8 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIIJXgYJKoZIhvcNAQcCoIIJTzCCCUsCAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMAsGCSqGSIb3DQEHAaCC B2AwggQqMIIDk6ADAgECAhB0CFe3m/ZpP4Hv9gtnY0XQMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAMIHMMRcw FQYDVQQKEw5WZXJpU2lnbiwgSW5jLjEfMB0GA1UECxMWVmVyaVNpZ24gVHJ1c3QgTmV0d29y azFGMEQGA1UECxM9d3d3LnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9yZXBvc2l0b3J5L1JQQSBJbmNvcnAuIEJ5 IFJlZi4sTElBQi5MVEQoYyk5ODFIMEYGA1UEAxM/VmVyaVNpZ24gQ2xhc3MgMSBDQSBJbmRp dmlkdWFsIFN1YnNjcmliZXItUGVyc29uYSBOb3QgVmFsaWRhdGVkMB4XDTk5MDkwMTAwMDAw MFoXDTAwMDgzMTIzNTk1OVowggESMRcwFQYDVQQKEw5WZXJpU2lnbiwgSW5jLjEfMB0GA1UE CxMWVmVyaVNpZ24gVHJ1c3QgTmV0d29yazFGMEQGA1UECxM9d3d3LnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9y ZXBvc2l0b3J5L1JQQSBJbmNvcnAuIGJ5IFJlZi4sTElBQi5MVEQoYyk5ODEeMBwGA1UECxMV UGVyc29uYSBOb3QgVmFsaWRhdGVkMTMwMQYDVQQLEypEaWdpdGFsIElEIENsYXNzIDEgLSBO ZXRzY2FwZSBGdWxsIFNlcnZpY2UxGTAXBgNVBAMUEFBldHJ1cyBMdW5kcXZpc3QxHjAcBgkq hkiG9w0BCQEWD3BlcHBlQHBlcHBlLm5ldDBcMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA0sAMEgCQQCZbD/Y fIanYgcc1+zWtuPlpRzZk1yok15hVgjx6g67zFgjRgf5mdfl2HMDoI3cTe1zGqbWKiqcseng bVsi665vAgMBAAGjggEGMIIBAjAJBgNVHRMEAjAAMIGsBgNVHSAEgaQwgaEwgZ4GC2CGSAGG +EUBBwEBMIGOMCgGCCsGAQUFBwIBFhxodHRwczovL3d3dy52ZXJpc2lnbi5jb20vQ1BTMGIG CCsGAQUFBwICMFYwFRYOVmVyaVNpZ24sIEluYy4wAwIBARo9VmVyaVNpZ24ncyBDUFMgaW5j b3JwLiBieSByZWZlcmVuY2UgbGlhYi4gbHRkLiAoYyk5NyBWZXJpU2lnbjARBglghkgBhvhC AQEEBAMCB4AwMwYDVR0fBCwwKjAooCagJIYiaHR0cDovL2NybC52ZXJpc2lnbi5jb20vY2xh c3MxLmNybDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFAAOBgQC5fUmoku364OgK4GcA/u+6p6yOHMML63HC8fNt SVjY8lAbScqnwXuAVb03UmeXJ5yvgJkN1ci3+p7MdchOgkDo09iMxvSxj2QAwHGTvnHsdiOa MuYs4hD9hqfGjAu0VDX0+oVpAa82vGt5WLqGDVUUOnijsjWHfHX1FCMCsj4cezCCAy4wggKX oAMCAQICEQDSdi6NFAw9fbKoJV2v7g11MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAgUAMF8xCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVT MRcwFQYDVQQKEw5WZXJpU2lnbiwgSW5jLjE3MDUGA1UECxMuQ2xhc3MgMSBQdWJsaWMgUHJp bWFyeSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIEF1dGhvcml0eTAeFw05ODA1MTIwMDAwMDBaFw0wODA1MTIy MzU5NTlaMIHMMRcwFQYDVQQKEw5WZXJpU2lnbiwgSW5jLjEfMB0GA1UECxMWVmVyaVNpZ24g VHJ1c3QgTmV0d29yazFGMEQGA1UECxM9d3d3LnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9yZXBvc2l0b3J5L1JQ QSBJbmNvcnAuIEJ5IFJlZi4sTElBQi5MVEQoYyk5ODFIMEYGA1UEAxM/VmVyaVNpZ24gQ2xh c3MgMSBDQSBJbmRpdmlkdWFsIFN1YnNjcmliZXItUGVyc29uYSBOb3QgVmFsaWRhdGVkMIGf MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQC7WkSKBBa7Vf0DeootlE8VeDa4DUqyb5xUv7zo dyqdufBou5XZMUFweoFLuUgTVi3HCOGEQqvAopKrRFyqQvCCDgLpL/vCO7u+yScKXbawNkIz tW5UiE+HSr8Z2vkV6A+HthzjzMaajn9qJJLj/OBluqexfu/J2zdqyErICQbkmQIDAQABo3ww ejARBglghkgBhvhCAQEEBAMCAQYwRwYDVR0gBEAwPjA8BgtghkgBhvhFAQcBATAtMCsGCCsG AQUFBwIBFh93d3cudmVyaXNpZ24uY29tL3JlcG9zaXRvcnkvUlBBMA8GA1UdEwQIMAYBAf8C AQAwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgEGMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAgUAA4GBAIi4Nzvd2pQ3AK2qn+GBAXEekmpt L/bxndPKZDjcG5gMB4ZbhRVqD7lJhaSV8Rd9Z7R/LSzdmkKewz60jqrlCwbe8lYq+jPHvhnX U0zDvcjjF7WkSUJj7MKmFw9dWBpJPJBcVaNlIAD9GCDlX4KmsaiSxVhqwY0DPOvDzQWikK5u MYIBxjCCAcICAQEwgeEwgcwxFzAVBgNVBAoTDlZlcmlTaWduLCBJbmMuMR8wHQYDVQQLExZW ZXJpU2lnbiBUcnVzdCBOZXR3b3JrMUYwRAYDVQQLEz13d3cudmVyaXNpZ24uY29tL3JlcG9z aXRvcnkvUlBBIEluY29ycC4gQnkgUmVmLixMSUFCLkxURChjKTk4MUgwRgYDVQQDEz9WZXJp U2lnbiBDbGFzcyAxIENBIEluZGl2aWR1YWwgU3Vic2NyaWJlci1QZXJzb25hIE5vdCBWYWxp ZGF0ZWQCEHQIV7eb9mk/ge/2C2djRdAwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKB9MBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkq hkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTAwMDIyOTE5NDEwM1owHgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMREw DzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBKDAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUgVNTVU9NxE+J/UnRZ+RL6QfeKGgw DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEQHXBv5rI3lgK3kFduMmRyzz3mU37h+khk1T9W4sM7WmJ1DkxWyNC HwUh8X6+ZCv+x5kHw31jPkThuw+070IzGQc= --------------msB53C9B030C06583AB9789EB8-- From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!newsfeed.netscape.com!unlisys!news.snafu.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!newsfeed.icl.net!netnews.com!newspeer1.nac.net!news.new-york.net!uunet!nyc.uu.net!lax.uu.net!dfw.uu.net!news-feeds.jump.net!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail From: andyitd@my-deja.com Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Netscape on DEC Alpha Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 22:01:00 GMT Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. Lines: 13 Message-ID: <89hfip$eim$1@nnrp1.deja.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 169.237.137.234 X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Feb 29 21:40:15 2000 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows NT) X-Http-Proxy: 1.1 x42.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 169.237.137.234 I can't seem to find a version of Netscape that will run on my DEC Alpha workstation (running NT 4.0). When I run the Communicator setup program intended for Windows95/98/NT I receiver the following message: "Setup requires a different versio of windows. Check to make sure you are running setup on the Windows platform for which it was intended. Error 102" Isn't NT for a DEC Alpha still NT!? Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy. From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!newsfeed.netscape.com!news.sgi.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.skycache.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail From: jojomatic@hotmail.com Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: SuSE 6.3 and Mozilla Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 22:26:44 GMT Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. Lines: 13 Message-ID: <89hh2v$fe6$1@nnrp1.deja.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.147.227.18 X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Feb 29 22:26:44 2000 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows NT) X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x22.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.147.227.18 X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDjojomatic I am currently having one heckuva a hard time installing Mozilla on my SuSE 6.3 system. RPM's wont install because of the old libjpeg version, and upgrading to the newest makes all sorts of things cranky. And I am having trouble compiling CVS pulls... No idea why... Does anyone have any suggestions? Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy. From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!news.columbia.edu!news-not-for-mail From: peller@columbia.edu (Adam Peller) Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: How to get stdout/console on win32? Date: 29 Feb 2000 20:27:06 -0500 Organization: Columbia University Lines: 8 Message-ID: <89hrla$t3p$1@konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu> References: <89eq6o$ltk$1@konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu> <38BAF271.6C7A6214@SSpaeth.de> <89esj8$8cn$1@konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu> <38BB01FA.1C2DD717@cs.cmu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu In article <38BB01FA.1C2DD717@cs.cmu.edu>, Robert O'Callahan wrote: >No, it does still work. Whoops. Sorry I didn't believe you the first time... It does work! How'd they do that? :) Thanks. -Adam From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Dario Copia Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Any docs about how EVENTS works on Mozilla? Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 23:54:04 -0500 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 2 Message-ID: <38BCA26C.9C9851A8@artide.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 1Cust64.tnt1.cambridge.ma.da.uu.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en TIA From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Landis Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Unable to install Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 01:07:12 -0500 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 11 Message-ID: <38BCB390.FEE74250@surfmi.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: zzz-209252248016.splitrock.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en Im trying to install M13 on NT4 sp6 512MB ram 6GB free space. Tried both ways, double click installer.exe in windows explorer and start>run>installer.exe. Both ways return same results. Splash comes up and a few seconds later the error "?".......well at this point I went back up stairs to my workstation to run install again so I could write the error message down, but I renamed the M13 blah blah- intaller.exe file to just installer.exe and well, I'm currently installing Mozilla M13 on my workstation. I'm still sending this message, just in case someone else has this problem. Don't run file as downloaded..... Rename to installer.exe... works fine! From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Jerry Baker Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Where is the build ID stored? Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 22:28:46 -0800 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 9 Message-ID: <38BCB89E.D0C863A8@weirdness.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lsanca1-ar3-145-172.dsl.gtei.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.71 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en When building my own copies of Mozilla it insists on calling itself 1999122808 even when it is a fresh pull from the FTP today. Where do I change this at before I build? -- Jerry Baker PGP Mail Preferred Key: http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x09DE91C6 From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!newsfeed.netscape.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!isdnet!newsfeed.icl.net!dispose.news.demon.net!demon!news.demon.co.uk!demon!gmt2000.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail From: "rvj" Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: applet compatibility issues Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 10:23:24 -0000 Message-ID: <951906142.9129.0.nnrp-06.9e9837d2@news.demon.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: gmt2000.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: gmt2000.demon.co.uk:158.152.55.210 X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 951906142 nnrp-06:9129 NO-IDENT gmt2000.demon.co.uk:158.152.55.210 X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Lines: 7 does anyone know if there is a newsgroup that covers Mozilla applet issues. tried to view a page with Surveyor Corp' JavaCamPush applet but no joy is there some sort of compatbility checklist? From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Robert Kaiser Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: Where is the build ID stored? Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 12:56:29 +0100 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 7 Message-ID: <38BD056D.D958608F@StarTrekMail.com> References: <38BCB89E.D0C863A8@weirdness.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: robert.hirsch.sth.ac.at Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [de] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: de-AT,de,en-US,en,it >From L10n work, I know that the build ID shown in Mozilla browser status bar is stored in chrome/navigator/locale/en-US/navigator.dtd Warning: Handle .dtd files with care!!! A false dtd (means syntactically wrong files - does not mean changed strings) can crash Mozilla.... Robert Kaiser From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!newsfeed.netscape.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!howland.erols.net!ix.netcom.com!news.tachyon.com!bogustachy.com!wayne From: wayne@tachyon.xxx.154188.killspam.08b3 (Wayne Sewell) Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: Netscape on DEC Alpha Date: 1 Mar 2000 07:32:25 CST Organization: Tachyon Software Consulting Lines: 38 Message-ID: References: <89hfip$eim$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Trace: dfw-ixnews3.ix.netcom.com 951945879 657 199.183.50.15 (1 Mar 2000 21:24:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@mindspring.com In article <89hfip$eim$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, andyitd@my-deja.com writes: > I can't seem to find a version of Netscape that > will run on my DEC Alpha workstation (running NT > 4.0). When I run the Communicator setup program > intended for Windows95/98/NT I receiver the > following message: "Setup requires a different > versio of windows. Check to make sure you are > running setup on the Windows platform for which > it was intended. Error 102" Isn't NT for a DEC > Alpha still NT!? > Yes, but it is a totally different CPU with a completely different instruction set. Alpha and intel executables are not even remotely compatible. That's what the "platform" means. Alpha is a different platform from intel. You cannot possibly install a software package on alpha unless: 1) alpha executables are included in the package, or b) the FX binary emulator/translator can convert the executables from intel to alpha. I don't run NT on alpha any more (or nt at all, for that matter), but it was always my experience that FX was very limited in what it would translate. Almost every package I tried to install contained some type of custom device driver, and FX does not even attempt to translate those. That said, I seem to recall that FX had its own setup program. You might try that instead of the setup that comes with the software package. It's somewhere in the fx directory tree. -- =============================================================================== Wayne Sewell, Tachyon Software Consulting (281)812-0738 wayne@tachyon.xxx http://www.tachyon.xxx/www/tachyon.html and wayne.html change .xxx to .com in addresses above, assuming you are not a spambot :-) =============================================================================== Butler:"Gentlemen!" Curly(as he and other Stooges look around):"Who came in?" From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Scott I. Remick Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: 2 bugs in build 2000022908 Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 11:05:28 -0500 Organization: Computer Alternatives, Inc. Lines: 18 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: scott.computeralt.com X-Newsreader: MicroPlanet Gravity v2.20 Not sure if this should go into n.p.m.general or n.p.m.builds so please advise... anyhow: 1) URLs typed in without the "http://" prefix don't work. It doesn't matter if you type them into the main location field, or pop up the Go To Location dialog (CTRL-L). 2) I am often loosing cursor/highlight in the location field. Testing suggests that the cursor is still doing what I wanted to (positioning, selecting, etc), but it's just not visible. Otherwise it appears to behave correctly. ----------------------- Scott I. Remick scott@computeralt.com Network and Information (802)388-7545 ext. 236 Systems Manager FAX:(802)388-3697 Computer Alternatives, Inc. http://www.computeralt.com From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!newsfeed.netscape.com!unlisys!news.snafu.de!news-FFM2.ecrc.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!netnews.com!newsfeed2.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!newsmaster1.prod.itd.earthlink.net!newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID: <38BD3FDA.D1E904EB@earthlink.net> From: gek@earthlink.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: News groups Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 6 Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 16:06:03 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.178.177.159 X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net X-Trace: newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net 951926763 209.178.177.159 (Wed, 01 Mar 2000 08:06:03 PST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 08:06:03 PST Organization: EarthLink Network, Inc. Can anyone tell me why the a news group will have, lets say, 300 articles and when you download it there are only 25. These are groups that I view daily, so the chance of having expired articles is slim. Please respond via email, Thanks! From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Lemming Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: News groups Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 19:05:08 +0000 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 24 Message-ID: <38BD69E4.4893A7F0@lemnet.com> References: <38BD3FDA.D1E904EB@earthlink.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: usr825-kno.cableinet.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en gek@earthlink.net wrote: > Can anyone tell me why the a news group will have, lets say, 300 > articles and when you download it there are only 25. These are groups > that I view daily, so the chance of having expired articles is slim. > > Please respond via email, Thanks! I am assuming you are talking about Netscape 4, in which case you didn't read any of the previous messages - something you should always do before posting to a newsgroup. If you HAD done so you would have noticed that this newsgroup is for the development of Netscape 5, NOT support for Netscape 4. In addition you asked for a reply via email. The motto for newsgroupd is "ask in newsgroup, reply in newsgroup". Oh, and for help with your problem please visit the Netscape Unofficial FAQ at http://www.ufaq.org/ or the communicator newsgroup at snews://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.communicator Thanks, Lemming, LemNet Manager http://www.lemnet.com/banners/ - Free targeted advertising http://www.lemnet.com/domains/ - Is your domain available? http://www.lemnet.com/guestbooks/ - Free guestbooks From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Adam Lock Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: News groups Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 20:13:17 +0000 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 11 Message-ID: <38BD79DD.457CD420@iol.ie> References: <38BD3FDA.D1E904EB@earthlink.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup-306.cork.iol.ie Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en gek@earthlink.net wrote: > > Can anyone tell me why the a news group will have, lets say, 300 > articles and when you download it there are only 25. These are groups > that I view daily, so the chance of having expired articles is slim. Probably someone spammed, sporged, forged, rogue cancelled or otherwise molested the group so that a lot of the messages were removed. -- Adam Lock - locka@iol.ie From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!newsfeed.netscape.com!pixie.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: John Morrison Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: 2 bugs in build 2000022908 Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 12:49:33 -0800 Organization: Netscape Lines: 22 Message-ID: <38BD825D.29124AA@netscape.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.12.39.231 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en "Scott I. Remick" wrote: > > Not sure if this should go into n.p.m.general or n.p.m.builds so please > advise... anyhow: > > 1) URLs typed in without the "http://" prefix don't work. It doesn't > matter if you type them into the main location field, or pop up the Go To > Location dialog (CTRL-L). I think a fix was checked in for this yesterday ~12pmPST. > > 2) I am often loosing cursor/highlight in the location field. Testing > suggests that the cursor is still doing what I wanted to (positioning, > selecting, etc), but it's just not visible. Otherwise it appears to > behave correctly. > > ----------------------- > Scott I. Remick scott@computeralt.com > Network and Information (802)388-7545 ext. 236 > Systems Manager FAX:(802)388-3697 > Computer Alternatives, Inc. http://www.computeralt.com From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Jerry Baker Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Another C newbie ?? Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 14:18:07 -0800 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 14 Message-ID: <38BD971F.E60E53FF@weirdness.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lsanca1-ar3-145-172.dsl.gtei.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.71 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en Is _itoa() XP compatible? I would like to use it in a function I am coding for use in nsHTTPhandler.cpp, but I need to know if it is XP compatible first. I can't tell for sure from the MSDN docs. If it is not compatible, is there an ANSI C equivalent? If you don't know, _itoa() converts an integer to a null terminated string and takes the form of _itoa(integer, string, radix). -- Jerry Baker PGP Mail Preferred Key: http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x09DE91C6 From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Jerry Baker Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: Another C newbie ?? Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 14:22:14 -0800 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 29 Message-ID: <38BD9816.F6E83A36@weirdness.com> References: <38BD971F.E60E53FF@weirdness.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lsanca1-ar3-145-172.dsl.gtei.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.71 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en Jerry Baker wrote: > > Is _itoa() XP compatible? I would like to use it in a function I am > coding for use in nsHTTPhandler.cpp, but I need to know if it is XP > compatible first. I can't tell for sure from the MSDN docs. > > If it is not compatible, is there an ANSI C equivalent? > > If you don't know, _itoa() converts an integer to a null terminated > string and takes the form of _itoa(integer, string, radix). > > -- > Jerry Baker OK. It may not matter if it is XP compatible or not depending on the answer to the following question (forgive my questions I am very new to C here). If there was a function that only worked on Win32, but it was inside of an #ifdef (XP_PC) would it matter? If it was inside of the #ifdef it would not trip up compilers on other platforms since they would ignore anything inside of that #ifdef right? Or am I not understanding how an #ifdef works? -- Jerry Baker PGP Mail Preferred Key: http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x09DE91C6 From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Robert O'Callahan Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: Another C newbie ?? Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 17:46:24 -0500 Organization: Carnegie Mellon University Lines: 30 Message-ID: <38BD9DC0.BA6B2927@cs.cmu.edu> References: <38BD971F.E60E53FF@weirdness.com> <38BD9816.F6E83A36@weirdness.com> Reply-To: roc+@cs.cmu.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: MAJESTY.FAC.CS.CMU.EDU Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en-GB,en Jerry Baker wrote: > Jerry Baker wrote: > > Is _itoa() XP compatible? I would like to use it in a function I am > > coding for use in nsHTTPhandler.cpp, but I need to know if it is XP > > compatible first. I can't tell for sure from the MSDN docs. > > > > If it is not compatible, is there an ANSI C equivalent? > > > > If you don't know, _itoa() converts an integer to a null terminated > > string and takes the form of _itoa(integer, string, radix). > > OK. It may not matter if it is XP compatible or not depending on the > answer to the following question (forgive my questions I am very new to > C here). > > If there was a function that only worked on Win32, but it was inside of > an #ifdef (XP_PC) would it matter? If it was inside of the #ifdef it > would not trip up compilers on other platforms since they would ignore > anything inside of that #ifdef right? Or am I not understanding how an > #ifdef works? You should be OK. Rob -- [Robert O'Callahan http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~roc 6th year CMU CS PhD student "I have seen the burden God has laid on men. He has made everything beautiful in its time. He has also set eternity in the hearts of men; yet they cannot fathom what God has done from beginning to end." --- Ecclesiastes 3:10-11] From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!newsfeed.netscape.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!remarQ70!supernews.com!remarQ69!gxsn.com!not-for-mail From: "Ben Graves" Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Could someone help me with layers in Mozilla Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 00:33:57 -0000 Organization: GXSN Lines: 11 Message-ID: <89kd2c$d74$1@gxsn.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.147.228.235 X-Trace: 951957388 1NNUCNF1GE4EBC393C gxsn.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@gxsn.com X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 I know this isn't really the right place to ask but could someone here help me with addressing layers in Mozilla. In 'IE5' I can use document.all.Layer1.style, what do I use so my JavaScript works with Mozilla? Any help would be great, ben_g From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: "Keith Bowes" Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: Could someone help me with layers in Mozilla Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 00:42:18 -0500 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 9 Message-ID: <89kv7n$cfr2@secnews.netscape.com> References: <89kd2c$d74$1@gxsn.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 208-26-98-59.inetone.net X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 > In 'IE5' I can use document.all.Layer1.style, what do I use so my JavaScript > works with Mozilla? document.getElementById('Layer1').style is the Mozilla equivalent. Believe it or not, it also works in IE5. From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!gateway From: mtulloch@winnie.fit.edu (Michael Tulloch) Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Testing sites on Moz / if speed killed i'd be 20 ft under Date: 2 Mar 2000 05:52:12 GMT Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <38BD825D.29124AA@netscape.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: h-207-200-73-41.netscape.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII To: mozilla-general@mozilla.org Everyone, Time for a little celebratory cheer...Moz on Win32 is F-A-S-T. That in my book makes it quite usable, that and the countless patches and long hard work put in by the code-fiends. Good job! It's really starting to feel like a beta, and man, that has the juices flowing here. Anyhow, I'm also working on a web site, and one of the browsers I've been using has been Moz. Since it's a more strict about standards, it makes a great testing tool, as well. Any other designers out there testing their stuff with Moz? ---Mike }-------------------------------------------------{ } Dark Journey : Poetry of the Crestfallen { } Poetry @ www.Fatbrain.com's E-matter { }-------------------------------------------------{ From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Jerry Baker Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: Testing sites on Moz / if speed killed i'd be 20 ft under Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 22:15:40 -0800 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 30 Message-ID: <38BE070C.2B3F9965@weirdness.com> References: <38BD825D.29124AA@netscape.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lsanca1-ar3-145-172.dsl.gtei.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.71 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en Michael Tulloch wrote: > > Everyone, > > Time for a little celebratory cheer...Moz on Win32 is F-A-S-T. That in my > book makes it quite usable, that and the countless patches and long hard > work put in by the code-fiends. Good job! It's really starting to feel > like a beta, and man, that has the juices flowing here. > > Anyhow, I'm also working on a web site, and one of the browsers I've been > using has been Moz. Since it's a more strict about standards, it makes a > great testing tool, as well. > > Any other designers out there testing their stuff with Moz? > ---Mike > }-------------------------------------------------{ > } Dark Journey : Poetry of the Crestfallen { > } Poetry @ www.Fatbrain.com's E-matter { > }-------------------------------------------------{ I do test with Mozilla now that quirks mode is starting to be a little more sane. Remember that if you want your HTML to be rendered by Mozilla according to strict HTML 4.0 specs, you need to indicate so at the top with a doctype declaration for the strict HTML 4.0 DTD. -- Jerry Baker PGP Mail Preferred Key: http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x09DE91C6 From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!newsfeed.netscape.com!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail From: Herve Foucher Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Persistant proxy authentification fails Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 07:50:08 GMT Organization: HELIO - Web Based Projects Lines: 27 Message-ID: <89l6fg$21g$1@nnrp1.deja.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.106.68.201 X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Mar 02 07:50:08 2000 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.72 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x29.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 193.106.68.201 X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDhfoucher I read in MozillaZine on February 13th, 2000: > "If you haven't tried a nightly build in the past few days, > we might have some reasons for you to do so. > Borofkin writes, "The latest nightly build has persistant proxy > authentication, making it usable for those of us whose only > Internet access is via an authenticating proxy server." So, I downloaded the latest nighly build and yes! it worked. But today, I've replaced this build by a new one (2000-03-01-16) and it is not persistant anymore :-( I am asked for a passwd at each page. It becomes even worst when using the proxy. The passwd is prompt for each page AND image. Before installing 2000-03-01-16, I had removed C:\winnt\moz* and everything in C:\Program Files\Mozilla. Does anyone make it work fine ? Config: PII 400Mhz / 256Mo / Win NT4SP4 -- Herve FOUCHER, HELIO Author of the SMIL and French tutorials http://www.helio.org/education/ Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy. From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Jerry Baker Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: Another C newbie ?? Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 00:52:41 -0800 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 15 Message-ID: <38BE2BD9.5BC4E78@weirdness.com> References: <38BD971F.E60E53FF@weirdness.com> <38BD9816.F6E83A36@weirdness.com> <38BD9DC0.BA6B2927@cs.cmu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lsanca1-ar3-145-172.dsl.gtei.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.71 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en Robert O'Callahan wrote: > > You should be OK. > > Rob > -- Mental note to self: Do not do _itoa([integer], [nsCString], [radix]) - you will crash msvcrt.dll...d'oh! -- Jerry Baker PGP Mail Preferred Key: http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x09DE91C6 From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!gateway From: "biswapesh_chatterjee"@tcscal.co.in (Chatterjee_Biswapesh) Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: good test siite Date: 2 Mar 2000 12:26:29 GMT Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 10 Message-ID: <65256896.00445FC9.00@svrsdfbldg.tcscal.co.in> NNTP-Posting-Host: h-207-200-73-41.netscape.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: mozilla-general@mozilla.org Somebody posted this link (http://www.essence.co.uk/essence/foldertree/document.htm) at mozillazine which crashes M14 (but not M13) - not very sure why but this is a pretty good DHTML test link. From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!gateway From: "biswapesh_chatterjee"@tcscal.co.in (Chatterjee_Biswapesh) Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: XML test page Date: 2 Mar 2000 12:43:31 GMT Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 9 Message-ID: <65256896.0045EF9A.00@svrsdfbldg.tcscal.co.in> NNTP-Posting-Host: h-207-200-73-41.netscape.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: mozilla-general@mozilla.org Here is another excellent XML test page: http://www.xml.com/1999/03/ie5/first-x.xml posted by someone at mozillazine and the nightlies mess this one up royally. Is this a known bug ? From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Robert Kaiser Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: Testing sites on Moz / if speed killed i'd be 20 ft under Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 14:27:29 +0100 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 7 Message-ID: <38BE6C40.B6C731E8@StarTrekMail.com> References: <38BD825D.29124AA@netscape.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: robert.hirsch.sth.ac.at Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [de] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: de-AT,de,en-US,en,it I do build all of my sites to display with Mozilla correctly, then looking if they are viewable on IE5 and Nav4.7 - and I must admit that I'll love the day when I can close out Nav4.7 from testing. That'll make life much more easy... Robert Kaiser From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: "V. Desai" Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Help needed..... Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 16:45:26 -0000 Organization: Intersoft Inc. Lines: 14 Message-ID: <89n1u9$kl51@secnews.netscape.com> Reply-To: "V. Desai" NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.208.38.24 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 I am new to this Mozilla stuff and, in fact, had my first look at Mozilla.org only about a couple of days back. I've gone ahead and downloaded ActivePerl, the GNU tools, etc. that are needed for building the lizard..... Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be too much of source code documentation and, since I am only used to the VC++ compiler, I am having trouble navigating the source code (no Class View, File View, etc.) I haven't decided in which area I'll contribute to the project. Thought I had better have a look at the stuff before I figure out where my skills lie and what I can do..... Could someone give me pointers on how to start navigating the source code? From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Christian Pinheiro Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.directory,netscape.server,netscape.public.general,netscape.public.mozilla.general,netscape.public.mozilla.java,netscape.public.admin Subject: [OFF-TOPIC] List dedicated to Netscape Enterprise Server Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 16:34:55 -0300 Organization: VeritelNet Brazil Lines: 37 Message-ID: <38BEC25F.12E1A6E7@veritel.com.br> NNTP-Posting-Host: saturn.veritel.com.br Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.7 sun4m) X-Accept-Language: en Xref: secnews.netscape.com netscape.public.mozilla.directory:1522 netscape.server:172 netscape.public.general:21597 netscape.public.mozilla.general:16872 netscape.public.mozilla.java:6959 netscape.public.admin:1276 In the course of configuring and using the Netscape Enterprise Server software, we have discovered that there is no single mailing list dedicated to this complex application, and that the traffic on the "netscape.server" newsgroup is too low to be useful. We would have benefited (and still would benefit) greatly from a list dedicated to the configuration and administration of the Netscape Enterprise Server software, and we believe that others using this software would find such a resource highly useful. Consequently, we have decided to host, on an experimental basis, a list dedicated to discussing problems related to the Netscape Enterprise Server software. We invite all interested in participating to subscribe. To subscribe, please send an e-mail (no subject needed) to: majordomo@lists.veritel.com.br with the following text in the first line of the body of the message: subscribe nes-managers-l [] Because this list is experimental, we are not, for the moment, hosting archives for the list. (Please note that, aside from being a user of software produced by Netscape, we have no association with Netscape, and this list has not been endorsed by nor has any connection with Netscape.) ---- Christian M Pinheiro System Administrator - VeritelNet Brazil From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Ray Yang Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: Testing sites on Moz / if speed killed i'd be 20 ft under Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 17:06:44 -0500 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 22 Message-ID: <38BEE5F4.4474D367@princeton.edu> References: <38BD825D.29124AA@netscape.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ray.student.Princeton.EDU Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en I'm not a website designer, I just browse, and this surprised me, since I'm on Win32 and one of my major gripes with Moz is the horrific time it takes to load compared to Netscape 4.7 and IE5. Guess it's something wrong with my system .... Ray Michael Tulloch wrote: > > Everyone, > > Time for a little celebratory cheer...Moz on Win32 is F-A-S-T. That in my > book makes it quite usable, that and the countless patches and long hard > work put in by the code-fiends. Good job! It's really starting to feel > like a beta, and man, that has the juices flowing here. > > Anyhow, I'm also working on a web site, and one of the browsers I've been > using has been Moz. Since it's a more strict about standards, it makes a > great testing tool, as well. > > Any other designers out there testing their stuff with Moz? > ---Mike From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!newsfeed.netscape.com!pixie.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: John Morrison Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: good test siite Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 15:35:39 -0800 Organization: Netscape Lines: 11 Message-ID: <38BEFACB.33D52D36@netscape.com> References: <65256896.00445FC9.00@svrsdfbldg.tcscal.co.in> NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.12.39.231 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en Yep it's http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30026 Thanks, John Chatterjee_Biswapesh wrote: > > Somebody posted this link > (http://www.essence.co.uk/essence/foldertree/document.htm) at mozillazine which > crashes M14 (but not M13) - not very sure why but this is a pretty good DHTML > test link. From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Daniel Veditz Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: Testing sites on Moz / if speed killed i'd be 20 ft under Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 16:08:47 -0800 Organization: Speaking only for myself Lines: 29 Message-ID: <38BF028F.EDABFD49@netscape.com> References: <38BD825D.29124AA@netscape.com> <38BEE5F4.4474D367@princeton.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: h-208-12-39-196.netscape.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en WinNT performance is pretty good; it's improving but still sucks on Win9x. I think that explains your differing experience. -Dan Veditz Ray Yang wrote: > > I'm not a website designer, I just browse, and this surprised me, since I'm on > Win32 and one of my major gripes with Moz is the horrific time it takes to > load compared to Netscape 4.7 and IE5. Guess it's something wrong with my > system .... > > Ray > > Michael Tulloch wrote: > > > > Everyone, > > > > Time for a little celebratory cheer...Moz on Win32 is F-A-S-T. That in my > > book makes it quite usable, that and the countless patches and long hard > > work put in by the code-fiends. Good job! It's really starting to feel > > like a beta, and man, that has the juices flowing here. > > > > Anyhow, I'm also working on a web site, and one of the browsers I've been > > using has been Moz. Since it's a more strict about standards, it makes a > > great testing tool, as well. > > > > Any other designers out there testing their stuff with Moz? > > ---Mike From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!gateway From: mtulloch@winnie.fit.edu (Michael Tulloch) Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: Testing sites on Moz / if speed killed i'd be 20 ft under Date: 3 Mar 2000 00:42:44 GMT Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 30 Message-ID: References: <38BF028F.EDABFD49@netscape.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: h-207-200-73-41.netscape.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII To: mozilla-general@mozilla.org, Daniel Veditz On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Daniel Veditz wrote: > WinNT performance is pretty good; it's improving but still sucks on > Win9x. I think that explains your differing experience. > > -Dan Veditz > > Ray Yang wrote: > > > > I'm not a website designer, I just browse, and this surprised me, since I'm on > > Win32 and one of my major gripes with Moz is the horrific time it takes to > > load compared to Netscape 4.7 and IE5. Guess it's something wrong with my > > system .... It would, if I was on NT. :) I'm using Win98, and the nightly build I got simply kills. It takes longer to load the prog than NN4.7, but it renders them faster. I can't compare it to IE 5, but I'd say it's a trifle faster than IE 4.01. I'm sure this won't be true for every single page out there, but from what I'v eseen so far, I'm impressed. My system is 400 Mhz K6-2, 128 Mb RAM, nothing spectacular in the video department. Maybe it's the RAM? ---Mike }-------------------------------------------------{ } Dark Journey : Poetry of the Crestfallen { } Poetry @ www.Fatbrain.com's E-matter { }-------------------------------------------------{ From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Ray Yang Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: Testing sites on Moz / if speed killed i'd be 20 ft under Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 23:40:17 -0500 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 15 Message-ID: <38BF4231.9940E1A8@princeton.edu> References: <38BF028F.EDABFD49@netscape.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ray.student.Princeton.EDU Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en Michael Tulloch wrote: > It would, if I was on NT. :) I'm using Win98, and the nightly build I got > simply kills. It takes longer to load the prog than NN4.7, but it renders > them faster. I can't compare it to IE 5, but I'd say it's a trifle faster > than IE 4.01. I'm sure this won't be true for every single page out there, > but from what I'v eseen so far, I'm impressed. > > My system is 400 Mhz K6-2, 128 Mb RAM, nothing spectacular in the video > department. Maybe it's the RAM? May well be -- I have 64 MB RAM, 400 Mhz PII, and am running way too many little background programs. And I'm not using the nightly builds ... maybe I should. Will see, I guess =) Ray From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: "Keith Bowes" Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: POT- Plugins Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 03:29:01 -0500 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 8 Message-ID: <89ntcu$n0c1@secnews.netscape.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 208-26-98-131.inetone.net X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Hello. I was wondering if there's perhaps a way to use plugins with Mozilla. For instance, when music, video, a Java applet, or something is embedded into a web page, the current milestone of Mozilla just shows a gray box. How could I, for example, associate audio and video with Real Player? From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: "Tony L." Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general,netscape.public.general Subject: FTP Question Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 07:28:40 -0700 Organization: Absolutely none Lines: 7 Message-ID: <38BFCC17.686566C9@zerbert.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ts24-98.ctaz.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en Xref: secnews.netscape.com netscape.public.mozilla.general:16881 netscape.public.general:21640 Hi, When you don't have the "Send email address as anonymous FTP password" box checked in Preferences/Advanced, what gets sent as the userid and password? Is the word "anonymous" sent as both? Thanks, Tony L. (real email address is atlinc@hotmail.com) From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:30 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!newsfeed.netscape.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!remarQ-easT!remarQ.com!supernews.com!rQ66!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: Nospam Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: uconv.dll and M14 crashing Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 11:07:36 -0500 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Lines: 6 Message-ID: <38BFE348.486F8A48@aug.com> X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.71 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mozilla Milestone 14 (and previous builds) crash upon startup. I found that removing ZoneAlarm, a firewall, from the system solved the problem. From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:31 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Jerry Baker Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general,netscape.public.general Subject: Re: FTP Question Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 08:26:51 -0800 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 17 Message-ID: <38BFE7CB.C1B7E9DA@weirdness.com> References: <38BFCC17.686566C9@zerbert.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lsanca1-ar3-145-172.dsl.gtei.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.71 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en Xref: secnews.netscape.com netscape.public.mozilla.general:16883 netscape.public.general:21652 "Tony L." wrote: > > Hi, > When you don't have the "Send email address as anonymous FTP password" > box checked in Preferences/Advanced, what gets sent as the userid and > password? Is the word "anonymous" sent as both? > Thanks, > Tony L. (real email address is atlinc@hotmail.com) Not sure what Mozilla does, but Netscape sends the username as "anonymous" and the password as "mozilla@". -- Jerry Baker PGP Mail Preferred Key: http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x09DE91C6 From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:31 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Daniel Veditz Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: Testing sites on Moz / if speed killed i'd be 20 ft under Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 08:31:13 -0800 Organization: Speaking only for myself Lines: 22 Message-ID: <38BFE8D1.FAE2B381@netscape.com> References: <38BF028F.EDABFD49@netscape.com> <38BF4231.9940E1A8@princeton.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: h-205-217-240-65.netscape.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en Ray Yang wrote: > > Michael Tulloch wrote: > > It would, if I was on NT. :) I'm using Win98, and the nightly build I got > > simply kills. It takes longer to load the prog than NN4.7, but it renders > > them faster. I can't compare it to IE 5, but I'd say it's a trifle faster > > than IE 4.01. I'm sure this won't be true for every single page out there, > > but from what I'v eseen so far, I'm impressed. > > > > My system is 400 Mhz K6-2, 128 Mb RAM, nothing spectacular in the video > > department. Maybe it's the RAM? > > May well be -- I have 64 MB RAM, 400 Mhz PII, and am running way too many > little background programs. And I'm not using the nightly builds ... maybe I > should. Will see, I guess =) Then what *are* you running? The performance of debug builds is *really* bad. The official M13 was OK, then the nightly builds got severely worse for a while, then the problem was found and recent M14 builds are faster again. -Dan Veditz From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:31 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Daniel Veditz Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: POT- Plugins Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 08:33:22 -0800 Organization: Speaking only for myself Lines: 17 Message-ID: <38BFE952.69F18FB4@netscape.com> References: <89ntcu$n0c1@secnews.netscape.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: h-205-217-240-65.netscape.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en Keith Bowes wrote: > > Hello. > > I was wondering if there's perhaps a way to use plugins with Mozilla. For > instance, when music, video, a Java applet, or something is embedded into a > web page, the current milestone of Mozilla just shows a gray box. How could > I, for example, associate audio and video with Real Player? Mozilla loads most Communicator-style plugins just fine. It will look in a "plugins" directory below the executable just as Communicator does. I think it will also load plugins found in a COmmunicator installation. I'm not sure if that's a permanent feature or was just a development time thing. -Dan Veditz From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:31 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Robert O'Callahan Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: Help needed..... Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 12:10:14 -0500 Organization: Carnegie Mellon University Lines: 18 Message-ID: <38BFF1F6.1DB76718@cs.cmu.edu> References: <89n1u9$kl51@secnews.netscape.com> Reply-To: roc+@cs.cmu.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: MAJESTY.FAC.CS.CMU.EDU Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en-GB,en "V. Desai" wrote: > Could someone give me pointers on how to start navigating the source > code? I suggest reading as much documentation on Mozilla.org as you can stand. Then play around with Mozilla a bit and think about what you would like to do. And only THEN go to http://lxr.mozilla.org and poke around for the code related to what you're interested in. (Post here or email me if you have trouble finding what you want.) Just browsing around can be fun but it's rarely very productive. Rob -- [Robert O'Callahan http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~roc 6th year CMU CS PhD student "I have seen the burden God has laid on men. He has made everything beautiful in its time. He has also set eternity in the hearts of men; yet they cannot fathom what God has done from beginning to end." --- Ecclesiastes 3:10-11] From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:31 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Ray Yang Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: Testing sites on Moz / if speed killed i'd be 20 ft under Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 12:56:23 -0500 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 11 Message-ID: <38BFFCC7.57F41613@princeton.edu> References: <38BF028F.EDABFD49@netscape.com> <38BF4231.9940E1A8@princeton.edu> <38BFE8D1.FAE2B381@netscape.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ray.student.Princeton.EDU Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en Daniel Veditz wrote: > Then what *are* you running? The performance of debug builds is *really* > bad. The official M13 was OK, then the nightly builds got severely worse > for a while, then the problem was found and recent M14 builds are faster > again. The official M14. Ray From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:31 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Richard Zach Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: POT- Plugins Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 18:40:26 -0800 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 7 Message-ID: <38C0779A.8020408@NOSPAMmath.berkeley.edu> References: <89ntcu$n0c1@secnews.netscape.com> <38BFE952.69F18FB4@netscape.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-63-194-82-58.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla 5.0 X-Accept-Language: en > Mozilla loads most Communicator-style plugins just fine. It will look in > a "plugins" directory below the executable just as Communicator does. Except on Linux. Linux legacy plugins don't work with Mozilla. http://developer.netscape.com/support/faqs/plugins/general.html From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:31 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Richard Zach Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: POT- Plugins Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 18:44:10 -0800 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 19 Message-ID: <38C0787A.5010306@NOSPAMmath.berkeley.edu> References: <89ntcu$n0c1@secnews.netscape.com> <38BFE952.69F18FB4@netscape.com> <38C0779A.8020408@NOSPAMmath.berkeley.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-63-194-82-58.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla 5.0 X-Accept-Language: en Richard Zach wrote: > > Mozilla loads most Communicator-style plugins just fine. It will look in > > a "plugins" directory below the executable just as Communicator does. > Except on Linux. Linux legacy plugins don't work with Mozilla. > > http://developer.netscape.com/support/faqs/plugins/general.html > Strike that URL. here's the right one. http://www.mozilla.org/docs/plugin.html From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:31 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!gateway From: jecg-pqg@ihug.co.nz (Jenni &/or Patrick) Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: Testing sites on Moz / if speed killed i'd be 20 ft under Date: 4 Mar 2000 09:03:49 GMT Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 38 Message-ID: <001a01bf85b8$8f0a0b20$2f6712ce@paddonhome1> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: h-207-200-73-41.netscape.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Michael Tulloch" , I certainly agree :) And it works even faster under Windows 2000. (3.5seconds to load default start page under win98se, compared to 2.9seconds to load default start page under win2k-prof). I'm certainly looking forward to the final release :) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Tulloch" To: Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2000 6:52 PM Subject: Testing sites on Moz / if speed killed i'd be 20 ft under > > Everyone, > > Time for a little celebratory cheer...Moz on Win32 is F-A-S-T. That in my > book makes it quite usable, that and the countless patches and long hard > work put in by the code-fiends. Good job! It's really starting to feel > like a beta, and man, that has the juices flowing here. > > Anyhow, I'm also working on a web site, and one of the browsers I've been > using has been Moz. Since it's a more strict about standards, it makes a > great testing tool, as well. > > Any other designers out there testing their stuff with Moz? > ---Mike > }-------------------------------------------------{ > } Dark Journey : Poetry of the Crestfallen { > } Poetry @ www.Fatbrain.com's E-matter { > }-------------------------------------------------{ > > From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:31 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!newsfeed.netscape.com!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!newsfeed.tli.de!newsfeed1.uni2.dk!news.get2net.dk!not-for-mail Message-ID: <38C10C3C.F4AD9896@ns-media.dk> From: Soren Birk Jacobsen X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX 6.5 IP32) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general,netscape.public.general,netscape.public.admin Subject: Text/fonts rendering extremely small, help! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 35 Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2000 14:14:36 +0100 NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.47.156.41 X-Complaints-To: abuse@uni2.dk X-Trace: news.get2net.dk 952173275 195.47.156.41 (Sat, 04 Mar 2000 13:34:35 MET DST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2000 13:34:35 MET DST Organization: UNI2 Internet Kunde Xref: secnews.netscape.com netscape.public.mozilla.general:16891 netscape.public.general:21691 netscape.public.admin:1277 Im administering a network of 15 O2's, they are set-up almost identically, but.. I have a webpage with educational material for my students http://hal9000.ots.dk/animation/ it is using a stylesheet I made wich is referring fonts in absolute pixel sizes. This pages renders fine on all but one of the O2's, this one machine renders the content of the table extremely/unreadably small. I have tried running netscape with remote display to another station and also another stations netscape displaying on the problem station, and it is clear that it is not a Netscape problem but rather a X/Wm problem since it is only when displaying the content on that machine that things go wrong. I have tried pretty much reinstalling all system components, and copied all files that would seem to be related from a working station, but still .. it renders the text small. Do anyone have an idea where to look? -- regards kurgan =================================== 10+ years in 3D graphics/animation ----------------------------------- Instructor + A|W reseller App.Eng. ICQ: 31301694 Mobile: (+45)40971688 From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:31 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: John Dobbins Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: uconv.dll and M14 crashing Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2000 08:27:24 -0500 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 8 Message-ID: <38C10F3B.10F533EB@bellsouth.net> References: <38BFE348.486F8A48@aug.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-78-141-45.atl.bellsouth.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf You don't have to remove ZoneAlarm. See my comments on Bug 28403 for instructions on using Mozilla with ZoneAlarm. Nospam wrote: > Mozilla Milestone 14 (and previous builds) crash upon startup. I found > that removing ZoneAlarm, a firewall, from the system solved the problem. From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:31 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: "Jonas Sicking" Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Guidelines when confirming bugs Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2000 06:41:01 +0100 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 37 Message-ID: <89ss0r$9aq1@secnews.netscape.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.247.16.38 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Since I currently don't have the skills to contribute to the mozilla project by coding I try to help out by going through unconfirmed bugs. However there are many cases when I'm not sure how to treat a bug. Is there any guidelines about when to confirm a bug? Is it enough just to look at the page and confirm that there really exists a bug (I.e. the "bug" is not just a problem, a special IE feature or just something that is not implemented in mozilla). Of course I always try to find out as much about the bug as possible before taking any steps with the bug, but once I've narrowed it down it would be nice to know what the RightThing (tm) thing to do is. Here are some problems I've came across: * How should a bugreport be treated? * How should a bug about feature that is not yet implemented in mozilla but probably will (XSLT, DOM-events, CSS2) be treated? * What should we do with a RFE? * If a simplified testcase is needed should this be marked in some way (BugAThon?) ? * Should bugs on top100 sites be treated in some special way (mark beta1/2 and top100) and what sites are considered top100? * Is it enough to see that there actually is a real bug on the page to mark it NEW, or should we assign it to the proper component and leave it UNCONFIRMED? For me it would be nice if we could confirm bugs as soon as we know that there really is a real problem. That way it is easier to keep track of new UNCONFIRMED bugs and give them proper treatment. I think a good idea would be to put some of these general rules on a page somewhere on the mozilla.org site and link to it from the http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/bug_status.html page. -- Jonas Sicking From - Mon Jan 07 12:56:31 2002 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Path: secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail From: Richard Zach Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general Subject: Re: Guidelines when confirming bugs Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2000 11:11:45 -0800 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Lines: 64 Message-ID: <38C2B171.1020607@NOSPAMmath.berkeley.edu> References: <89ss0r$9aq1@secnews.ne